| Necromunda said:
Therefor, size does matter, because there is a BIOLOGICAL THRESHOLD. You don't seem to get that, I was a Biology Major for a year, and even though I switched, I learned a great deal about the eyes mechanics. There is a point, concerned with size, at which the eye loses its ability to distinguish individual objects. These pixels, since they are NOT being blown up, cannot be individually distinguished by the human eye, as they are far past the point at which an eye can recognize. Do you understand? A robotic sensor for instance, at this distance, may be able to distinguish, using your calculation, however a human eye has its limits, which your particular calculation does not account for. |
I am sorry, I just don't agree and I am pretty sure I'm right.
Doesn't matter if they are magnifying it or not.
Even if there is absolutely no magnifying and they are placing the OLED 0.6 inches away from your eye (thats how close it needs to be to appear 750 inches at 20 meters and 150 inches at 3 meters), and then placing a lens in between to help your eye "focus" for an image that close, you will see pixelation. Yes, human eye, with 20/20 vision will see pixels on a 0.7 inch 720p screen if its 0.6 inches away from it and in focus.
In order not to see pixels, the tiny OLED screen needs to be 1.2 inches away from your eye...but at that distance, you wouldn't be getting an image equivalent of 750 inch screen at 20 meters, so they would have to blow it up to make it look that big. Its lower pixel density no matter if they blow it up or not...
1080p for this image size would be perfect btw. And they should be able to do it, as Texas instruments can cram 1080p resolution using 2 million tiny mirrors in to a 0.6 inch chip.
