By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Necromunda on 04 September 2011
Edit Thread
disolitude said:
Necromunda said:

It's been speifically pointed out, multiple times, that its made to "Look" like the screen is 750 inches. There is no pixelation, regardless of if you want to admit it or not. Considering ALL of the major tech publications out there have put out a hands on impression of the device, and virtually everyone has stated its top of the like in picture quality, and no pixelation at all has been noted. I've stated this multiple times, yet you have yet to address this in a single one of your responses.

 Notice how there has been numerous size variences in report, stating it appears as a 750 inch screen from 20 meters, or a 150 inch screen from 3 meters. They aren't saying it ACTUALLY looks like a 750 inch screen, or a 150 inch screen, they are meerly giving a perspective, a relation to what it is like to use the device.


Thats because 750 inch screen at 20 meters looks the same as 150 inch screen for 3 meters...and probably looks the same as 0.7 inch screen from 1 inch (or whatever this thing projects). All goes back to the screen size vs viewing distance formula...

All those viewing options have the exact same amount of pixels visible to the human eye.

And as far as the tech impressions, I havent seen any mention anything about resolution. They all say it looks great. What does that mean? Till you show me a credible source saying "1080p would make absolutely no difference here as the human eye can't see 720p at 150 ich screen viewed at 3 meters", or till I try it first hand and verify myself, I don't see your argument...

And believe me, I will try and buy something like this way before someone like M.U.G.E.N if its as good as you say it is...


I'm not talking about amount, as much as I am talking about size. Resolution is considerably less important as is what most tech junkies are talking about, the PPI of the device:

The crux of the HMZ-T1 are the two OLED panels. Each of these panels is only 0.7-inch in size and have a resolution of 1280 x 720, which gives them a mind-blowing pixel density of 2098-PPI. Each of these displays on the HMZ-T1 are positioned in a way that they recreate the experience of watching a 750-inch 3D TV from 20m. Also, since these are two separate displays, it takes care of the cross-talk and the headache of watching a single display creating two images, as each eye is shown a different image, making the 3D experience more natural.

Size does matter here, thats the key, pixel size ALWAYS matters. Hence why Bigger TV's are better off with higher resolutions. What I'm trying to get at here is, by the human eye, these pixels are not even remotely close to being recognizable, we cannot distinguish them. Even though the screen is being shown as being displayed as in relation to a 750 inch screen from 20 meters away, the actual lens correction itself, most importantly, on such a minute scale, will be VERY minor, considering not much would have to be done, as you must realize, this is a VERY small distance between eye and screen (~1 inch) And as stated before, the only reason for the tweak at all is to trick your eyes into being able to focus in such a small distance between eye and object. So when putting this all together, even when tweaking, due to pixel size, you still should not be able to notice the pixels themselves.