| Michael-5 said:
However rating isn't everything, it's also public appeal, and how polished the game is. Halo is an easy game for any FPS fan to pick up and play. Killzone isn't as online or co-op friendly as Halo is, not even close. Also Halo and Gears are more online focused then Resistance and Killzone, that afftects sales too.
|
now see that statement is not true, and we can look at it as opinion, perception, or personal experiance.
i find the only thing COD has over Killzone is customization for weapons and speed of gameplay, but KZ is the shooter that actualy has the weight of someone carrying alot of equipment which is how a true military shooter should feel.
maybe KZ3's AI is to smart for some people which is the case most of the time when i sit someone that plays COD down infront of KZ. that say they can play any shooter and as soon as i put the controler in there hands they either say this shits to intence for me, or how the fuck that dud got up from that headshot.
even the online multiplayer overwhelmes them.
COD has become to casual and simple of a franchise and overtly predictable.
KZ is online friendly, and it even has a sortove hord mode called botzone. you can set and customize your own matchs which makes KZ community friendly.
KZ3 should not have been coop and nore should KZ ever be. its just not that kind of game.
i've got several 360 owners because of KZ3 saying fuck playstation. the games are to hard to play they should make games easyer to play. yes i find it funny.
