| Necromunda said: I'm sorry, but excuse me? Do you have any idea what your talking about...? 1, they are OLED, so it gives a superior picture to most LCD's. Also, how is that resolution nothing to brag about, do you know how resolution works? Its all about PIXEL DENSITY. As in, with this, your going to have the same amount of pixel's in a 0.7 inch screen that you do in say a 32 inch 720p TV. FYI, thats nothing short of mind bogglingly amazing. And currently top of the line as far as any commerical screen tech goes right now. You might want to get your facts straight. Sorry to be so forward, but if you don't know what your talking about, don't comment, as it only spreads misinformation. And FYI, theres nothing like these for instance, on the market right now, they don't even close to compare to anything out. Also, the media, not to mention every major tech publication is clamoring over this Headset, stating it to be one of the most immersive, visually unbelievable experiences to have come out to the commercial public, to date. I actually started a thread on this myself, with nothing short of a plethora of information, the lack of information is this thread seriously isn't close to doing it justice. Thats obvious considering the recognition and praise I'm getting for the device in my thread. So any of you non-believers out there might want to take a gander at my thread, as you might, and probably will change your minds. This is, in essence, is the beginning of the future for entertainment IMO. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=133611&page=1# |
Oh god...yes yes, Sony made it its amazing. Just take my money...
Seriously though, it would seem like you have no clue and are just spitting out irrelevant resolution numbers. Everyone should know by now that quality of perceived resolution is dependant on viewing distance vs screen size.
While its amazing that they crammed 720p in to 0.7 inches of screen, to a user this apparently has a screen size of 750 inches from 20 meters away.
Lets take a smaller perceived screen as an example. If you take a 42 inch screen at 720p, the optimal viewing distance is 8.5 feet. If you sit any closer you will be able to make out individual pixels on a 42 inch screen, doing 720p.
Now this visor screen appeas as a 750 inch screen to the viewer...750 inch screen needs a distance of 146 feet in order for viewers not to see individual pixels. The Sony 3D visor has a viewing distance of 65 feet (20 meters) which is 2.3X closer than recomended viewing distance for such a screen. You will see some major pixelation using this product...
Funny thing is, the product I mentioned before has a resolution of 852 x 480 and shows a 75 inch image at 10 feet - http://www.avforums.com/forums/tvs/312431-optimum-screen-size-viewing-distance.html
These glasses actually have better resolution to distance/screen size ratio than Sony is offering with their glasses, as the screen is only 2X closer than recomended viewing distance. Not much better, but better enough to make your statement of "nothing compares to these on the market" look foolish.
I suggest you google screen size vs distance calculator next time before you say things like "720p on 0.7 inch screen, Amazing!".
And yes OLED is better than LCD, but at that resolution both will look pixelated.
Edit - I don't want to come of like Im hating on this cause its a neat concept. At 299, sign me up...399, maybe. But this will be 1000 bucks by the time it gets to America. I can buy a 3D projector for that much money and have just as big of a screen on my wall which my friends can share with me. Too costly for what it offers...
