| Allfreedom99 said: Ah, yes....man will always want proof for every claim of existence. Its really in our nature to prove what is real...to be the one that is "correct". Several times I have gotten involved in these debates and the ball will continually get beaten around back and forth. here is what I will say: scientists can observe that if they place pieces of metals, plastics, and various materials in a sealed room for many years and then observe the result it is not going to eventually form a laptop. The pieces will stay as they lay and even deteriorate over time. No scientist can observe any form of order taking place to better those materials into something more complex. Therefore from scientific observation I don't see life spontaneously occuring no matter how much time is given. I have not seen science proove something like that occuring, so from a rational stand point I don't see how man can say there was no intelligent intervention in the beginning. And so the rebuttals will continue... |
What has the properties of inorganic matter got to do with the properties of organic matter exactly? Why would scientists try and understand evolution and the inception of life by using inorganic elements?
Just curious because that's a pretty odd analogy in my book.
As for the thread, it's impossible to do really. There is no direct proof for God anywhere so far as I am aware, just indirect and faith based - i.e. the Universe is complex therefore it must have been created, how can something like an eyeball evolve, etc. Therefore it is impossible to do. I mean as an atheist I find some of the responses pretty funny but c'mon, give the religious folk a break this request is impossible to fufill.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...
