leatherhat said:
snakenobi said:
leatherhat said:
snakenobi said:
leatherhat said:
snakenobi said:
leatherhat said:
snakenobi said:
you can keep on investing in future tech but that is what brings these economic downturns in the economy and people suffer,that money can be used for people to be happy and live in the present not just work for something that is completely not needed atm or in the near future
|
What in the hell are yuo talking about?
|
what the hell are you talking about?
people don't have money to live and you are saying that we should invest in future fantasy projects
|
So should we scrap NASA and spread the money we would spend on it to poor people? Because news falsh, that wouldn't go very far.
|
no i am saying we should spend a small amount not the billions we keep on spending every year on NASA,ESA,Russian space program
the 1960's US spending was a joke.spedning money for pride..........lol,after that they realise oh_fuck this was just a fantasy and we go back to earth
money should be spent in the economy for short term things
competition among boeing,airbus and other manufactures itself will lead to advancement in the long term and it will not effect the social-economics
|
Do you have any idea how insignificant NASA's budget is?
|
insignificant to what?
stop comparing
those few billions itself make big difference
|
Insignificant to the millirary, to welfare, to social security, to the budget as a whole.
Those few billions don't make a difference. At all. America can wipe its ass with a few billion.
|
don't compare military funding with NASA funding
military has its own funding and has contractors like lockheed martin which compete amongst each other
and the amount US spends on military has lots to do with politics rather then the need of soceity,US creates its own enemy and now US have to spend as much to protect itself and its status in the world
NASA doesn't get involved here,yeah they collaborate sometimes but to mix weapon development with space funding is totally wrong
