Kasz216 said:
Because the first suggests you were screwed because you didn't read what was written on the paper. That's like claiming your morgage lied becuase you didn't read all the terms of your morgage. You could trust everything that was written on paper. You just didn't bother to read it. The second part suggests a direct dishonsety and not sticking to a deal. The first is about poltical incompetence, the second just outright deception... and again, if you believe the second, then what's the point of trying for an agreement at all, since they're all going to be lies? As for your opinion. Pretty much all stances have reason in the real world. It's objectivity that allows your to sort through the reason and find which makes the most sense. |
It's not as complicated as you're making it out to be: Our "leaders" (not) didn't bother to study it carefully, and as such, we didn't see the deception in them until it became a reality.
Regarding my opinion...I don't see what you're asking for. Yes I openly oppose the Israeli government, but it's within complete reason.
Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!
Kojima: Come out with Project S already!







