Jay520 said:
I Don't understand your first sentence. As for your second sentence, I will say that Halo is only being handled by one team as far as I know. Kinect is utilising a lot resources and the majority of the fanbase may not want it. But MS is trying to use its energy with Kinect to expand its fanbase while leaving the core, for the most part, to 3rd parties. whether or not that's a good plan is up for debate and will surely be revealed in the future. As for the second paragraph, I would want the former. But that question doesn't apply to Halo. A.) we've only had two full-fledged Halo games and B.) I don't know if the team working on halo has the skill to make another quality new IP. |
More people don't want to purchase Halo who own a 360 then people who do. Just by sheer numbers, they aren't addressing their entire fanbase. That's a problem, a very large problem at that. Same deal with Kinect or focusing way too much on any one singular resource.
We have had (3) Full-priced Halo releases, don't make exceptions for it. On the verge of four. (Which we may see five this generation yet) . What exactly is Microsoft going to go for on the Next Xbox?...I can promise you we will see another Halo releasing pretty early into it's life. If a team isn't qualified or skilled enough to make another new IP, what makes you think they will be able to live up to the high expectations for the Halo franchise?
And doesn't that essentially by your own definition fall into the milking category if the latter is true?







