setsunatenshi said:
Well, if we don't want to be debating semantics on an internet forum, it would be better for all if we stuck with the more familiar meaning of words and how the huge amount of people understands them. I believe you will only be causing yourself a problem when mixing atheism as your 'religion'. I say this because then you will be viewed as the person with the positive claim that there are no gods and therefore you will have the burden of proof on this one. On the otherhand if you say you are (for example) a secular humanist and a rationalist, then you would probably still be stating your 'religious' view of the reality and atheism would simply be a consequence of your rationalistic view. Therefore when someone would ask you to prove a god doesn't exist, you can reply 'define your god and I will tell you if I believe in it or not'. to make it simple, simply saying you're an atheist is meaningless. to be an atheist you need to be in respect to a certain claim that someone will put (like YHWH created the world in 7 days and heaven exists somewhere in the sky) and then you can be an atheist to that god claim.
(i hope i could explain myself well, sorry if i didn't) |
but i like arguing the sematics. xD
and i do have claims to my religion. the core of christianity is the a person has a soul that is a seperate concept from the body that even in death is able to live on. my belief is that my "soul" and my body are one. that while more complex in nature that which is my personality is fundementally the same as a computer program, a genitic code of action and reaction, input and output, coded in the molecules of my brain. upon death i will face nothing, the big empty if you will as without the body there is nothing to my existence.