Hyruken said:
Having a marketshare does not mean big sales. As pointed out to you now countless times if a country has 5 people and they buy 5 consoles that is still 5 sales it is a 100% ownership. If a country has 100 people and sells 6 consoles that is 6 sales and a 6% ownership. Now if you had a company would you be trying to sell your products to the 5 people in the first country who already own your product or to the 94 other people in the other country who don't? Because what you are saying is to sell the product to the country with 5 people. As in your definition that would be your "strong region". Even though it makes less money for you then the other country. What your basically saying/implying is that PS3 should be doing better in UK because it is 3rd sales wise. But even while it is 3rd sale wise in the UK it still sells more then it being 1st in France. If Sony as a company had to shut down sales in either France or UK where do you think they would shut down? The place with the biggest Marketshare or the place that gives them most sales? They would shut down France because they make more money being 3rd in the UK then they do with being 1st in France. That shows UK is "stronger market" then France for Sony. |
Actually to an extent I understand what he is saying. If I was heading Sony's marketing team, I would keep pushing the PS3 to continue selling in France despite it being one of Sony's strongest nations, but at the end of the day my marketing efforts would be intensifying in the UK to gain market share where it is weaker when compared to Nintendo and M$. I am surprised because for an analyst that should have been something you should have caught at first glance, I'm only a measly marketing student and it wasn't that hard to read into it.
Make games, not war (that goes for ridiculous fanboys)
I may be the next Maelstorm or not, you be the judge http://videogamesgrow.blogspot.com/ hopefully I can be more of an asset than a fanboy to VGC hehe.







