fordy said:
And the uniqueness about pre-1983 social security was that there was a much higher ratio of worers paying into social security than retirees taking out, which was when the boomer generation was working. This is why the measures for surplus were taken in 1983 to generate a surplus because they foresaw the decrease in worker to retiree ratio. Now, social security had enough to pay it's way until 2037, that is until government robbed that piggy bank to buy votes. you've got it mixed up. The ones writing IOUs are the Income tax, taking the money that is rightfully the American workers in social security and replacing it with IOUs. Now that they find themselves having to pay it back...suprise suprise, now one side wants to scrap it completely. Talk about being untrustworthy with paying back what you owe.... |
I never said there was a surplus... because there never was. You misread.
The Social Security trust fund is... and always has been filled with by government bonds... when there was more money being paid in then there was paid out... this money was ALWAYS spent by the government that year on something else.
There isn't any money in the social security trust fund It's IOUS in the form of "special" government bonds.
There is nothing there but a vague gurantee by polticians that they will pay out those IOUs in there.
You are just... wrong. At 1983, all that happened was that government started to use those worthless government bonds to pay for other stuff as a fun accounting trick to raise the deficit without raising the deficit.








