| crissindahouse said: some people really seem to think 10 times more spendings on military means a 10 times better army lol. maybe the army is 2 times better than. |
I remember when people here were comparing ROK and DPRK militray potential by military spendings, getting the results like 5:1. Nobody even bothered to factor in PPP, though even that would be absolutely insufficient, unless we take differencies in army structure and product development into account, from personnel salaries, to production chains and sizes of batch production. Different realities could result in rather different pricepoints, which is obvious after a little thinking.
| crissindahouse said: but funniest guy was the guy who said american military is so great single fighters could destroy squadrons of others countries fighters lol... |
Is that some variation of infamous "144 your traditional fighters vs. 1 F-22 in computer-simulated fight" meme? They're created mainly by lobbists for the reason to sell something to someone, nobody takes them seriously except for interweb warriors.
|
Kasz216 said: There's a reason why they don't even sell it to their closest allies even at a 250 million+ cost. |
And what is that exactly? O_o
