Kasz216 on 12 August 2011
| crissindahouse said: wow are some people here serious? one guy says usa could easily invade china because they spend much more money for militray wtf? sure theyy do but they have to fight on another ground against millions of soldiers. supplies had to come from thousands of miles away. it would take t long to change strategies etc. and china is lot to big to win a war against. same with russia and for sure usa no way their could be a country win a war on usa, russian or chinese ground even if this country spends only 10% for military then the invading country. but funniest guy was the guy who said american military is so great single fighters could destroy squadrons of others countries fighters lol? just because an american fighter cost 10 or 100 times more doesnt mean one fighter can destroy 10 or 100 other fighters in a war. maybe one can destroy 2-3 of the others but if there would be a fight over china with 1000 chinese fighters and 100 american fighters the american figters wouldn have any chance. it's not only the technology it's a lot of tactics as well and if they both have the same good or bad tactic it is easy for a few bad fighters to destroy the most modern fighter on this planet even if one fighter costs 100billion. some people really seem to think 10 times more spendings on military means a 10 times better army lol. maybe the army is 2 times better than. |
Wasn't an overstatement the current top of the line US Fighter can detect and fire at other countries top level fighter jets before they are even in range to detect them let alone within firing distance.
There's a reason why they don't even sell it to their closest allies even at a 250 million+ cost.
