| sapphi_snake said: @mantlepiecek: I have two very good islamic friends so I am obviously islamophobic. /sarcasm. Hitler had a favorite Jew too. Sure maybe I am wrong about the majority thing, but they certainly are the most persistant ones and the ones that are spread throughout the world. Also they conduct terrorism for religious purposes(or at least derived from it) and I meant it in a purely religion way but realised there are other terrorists as well so you are right. I don't know any other group of terrorists doing it for religion other than christians and they don't do it that much anymore. They're not he majority. Separatist terrorists are the primary form of terrorist. And Islamic terrorists are more anti-globalization terrorists, then they are religious terrorists. They have more in commom with Conservatives from the West that you'd think. Is Genghis Khan a white? Say it.....
Are the japanese western? Are the chinese considered as whites? Genghis Khan was just a military leader. He didn't practice genocide, nor did he destroy entire civilizations (heck, in China the mongols were absorbed by the locals, and not vice versa). The Japanese were just as bad as whites, but they failed (thankfully). Also your logic is fail once again. Lets say Mr. X's father killed Mr. Y's father. In such a case Mr. X is not responsible for Mr. Y. Simple really. Are are you going to say that this is individuality? lmao it makes no difference so hopefully you will say something else. In the case of nation states, the nation is responsable for it's actions, and this doesn't go away the next generation. If nation X commited genocide upon nation Y, nation X will still be responsable for that act, even after the people who ran the nation at that moment are dead. So the straight population is the klu klux klan? Or even comparable? No. The heterosexist population however is. (I think I should've used the term heterosexist from the get go, as not all heterosexuals are heterosexist, but the people who want to hold 'straight pride' certainly are). Is that so? So they said that they want to show off their supremacy? Ok show the proof by quoting them. Read the article. |
Hitler had a favorite Jew too.
Except unlike hitler I have nothing against the muslims. If you go back and read you would realize that it was a hypothesis something you fail to realize.
In the case of nation states, the nation is responsable for it's actions, and this doesn't go away the next generation. If nation X commited genocide upon nation Y, nation X will still be responsable for that act, even after the people who ran the nation at that moment are dead.
No they are not. There's a certain time period after which effects wear off. That time period depends upon how progressive the locals are. Also this is just blame game. I mean blacks lived in the USA so obviously its not a nation that's invaded another nation. How can that have a huge effect? You are using the same logic on groups after all.
And the japanese had a nuclear bomb on their nation......lmao if you think they are oppressed right now you are mistaken. They have good relationship with foreigners and they don't think that America owes them anything. At least most of them. Your views that a nation should act like they are oppressed is misplaced.
No. The heterosexist population however is. (I think I should've used the term heterosexist from the get go, as not all heterosexuals are heterosexist, but the people who want to hold 'straight pride' certainly are).
So what if someone wanted to celebrate "sexuality pride parade" involving all the bisexuals and gays and straights.....would that be heterosexist as well? Would that be supremacy as well, since the straights are included as well? After all straights doing pride parade is obviously supremacy according to you.
