Rath said:
cyberninja45 said:
Rath said:
cyberninja45 said:
I never said it collapsed straight away but it imploded suddenly/rapidly before any chance for evacuation.(meaning the time between the jet collided and the implosion )
|
The time between when the jet collided and the implosion was an hour for one tower and an hour and a half for the other. In this time thousands of people were succesfully evacuated.
I really don't get what you're saying here?
|
Thousands of people evacuated doesn't mean an evacuation(full) of the building. Thousands of people died, thats not a successful evacuation.
|
You're saying that the collapse must be on purpose because the building was not able to be fully evacuated beforehand? That makes no sense, they were lucky to be able to evacuate as many as they did - in building collapses that rarely happens.
|
Stop twisting my words, I never said the collapsed was on purpose or not. But if a scenario has to take place where only a certain section in skyscrapers' upper steel support is weakened for whatever reason , then its obviously a 'stupid' design where its highly possible in resulting in the entire building imploding completely, asymmetrically ,suddenly/rapidly where thousands of people may still be inside with little to no time for evacuation. Thats a DEATH TRAP. That should only be possible with the use explosives at precise locations in a tall building. Especailly in skyscrapers of that capacity.
And if you are proudly admitting this is the norm and nothing is wrong, then you are sounding foolish.
