NinjaguyDan said:
sethnintendo said:
Funny thing is that they are trying to beat cancer the wrong way. They are trying to make healthy living into a prescription pill that will probably have many side effects (including probably cancer). Prescription medication is making the human population weaker and more susceptible to disease (or at least making viruses drug resistant). A world without cancer would be a world without humans. Humans are the real cancer on the planet.
Also, the ways they fight cancer in USA are downright pathetic. Anyone who undergoes chemotherapy might as well sign their death certificate. Chemotherapy has to be one of the worst "inventions" for mankind. Instead of trying to correct the lifestyle changes that brought the person to cancer they go ahead and destroy all cells (healthy and cancerous) in your body. You know what? Most of the times it will probably come back because they really didn't even get rid of the cancer. Instead of pumping your body full of micro-nutrients from veggies and fruit they point a death ray at you and expect you to live. Medical industry is a pure joke.
|
WRONG!
I was diagnosed with leukemia in an advanced stage on June 16th, 1988 and given the standard course of chemo at the time, nasty shit, followed by a bone marrow transplant and I'm still here to talk about it.
As long as there is life, there is hope.
|
I know plenty of people survive chemo. However, there are way better options than doing chemo. Chemo kills more healthy cells than cancerous cells. Does chemo help save lives? I am sure it does and if the patient survives they will say chemo helped when it could have been other factors. Although, if the patient dies after receiving chemo the doctor blames the cancer not the chemo (when the chemo probably sped up the patient's death). You can't have it one way and not the other.
