9/11 was a conspiracy not a conspiracy theory

[cyberninja45]

NightDragon83 said:

cyberninja45 said:

After reading some comments I realize that there are  two types people here. One that believes 9/11 was a conspiracy, and one that does not. And have to say the ones that doesnt are the ones who sounds  foolish.
I mean they are 'officially' and unwittingly arguing that tall buildings were designed to be  death traps for themselves. i.e. designed to implode rapidly on them (without the need for explosives charges) giving little/no time for evacuation .

And they ague this proudly to LOL. Well I hope yall are proud to be AmericansXD.

I was unaware that mandating that skyskrapers must be able to withstand the impact of a jumbo jetliner full of fuel and traveling at speeds exceeding 600mph was part of the International Building Code prior to 9/11... or at all.

Amm.... I think there is a difference between ''not withstanding impact'', and imploding rapidly/suddenly with little or no time for evacuation u know.

And wasnt the official explanation was the heat weakening a section in the upper steel structure is what caused the implosion XD? (Which means if there was somehow no fire after the impact the building would  still be standing today). Does this  also mean that all you have to do for a skyscrapers to implode suddenly/rapidly on YOU is just to weaken the a small section upper steel structures with heat?( No explosives necessary but maybe something to remove the fireproofing)  And does this  means skyscrapers are death traps?

So either way u argue dude is either a conspiracy theory or death trap theory.