kber81 on 23 February 2007
sieanr said:
Diomedes1976 said:
Well ....it seems a disaster yes ...those graphics would be at home on a Dreamcast or PS2 at best .
I guess it's a good thing no one cares about gameplay, becuase we all know graphics never improve as a game's development advances.
This one is great. Gameplay? What are you trying to say? It sounds like this - "good-looking game has no gameplay, only crap like this can be fun". We all know.... ? Who are we. When I play racing game I like to feel the machine instead of moving some kind of block on the screen. When I play FPP shooter I'd like to feel the bullets flying around instead of watching some pixelised sprites. When I play horror game I'd like to be scared. I want graphic to be real. Look at lava and the columns - what is this? It is much more difficult to create great graphic than gameplay. When I have to pay for a game (especially when games on PS3, X360 and Wii cost almost the same) I expect great gameplay and graphic - Wii can't provide both of this.
