Sao Paolo's Gonna Have... a Straight 'Pride' Parade? O_o

[sapphi_snake]

haxxiy said:

1. The market slavery as we know it was created by africans though. It was a very difficult operation which involved building fortresses in the african coastline and careful negotiations with the local leaders and kings, who were actually the ones who sold criminals and mainly tribal war prisioners as slaves. If you weren't any smart you could even end up as their slave. There's more than one report of white men being enslaved by african kings due to debts and so on.

2. And that's without mentioning that, at least in SA, most slave owners had only one or two slaves... which all went to work together and eat in the same table. Slave owners leaving all their inheritance to ex-slaves. Free slaves who actually try to get money to buy slaves as one of the first things once they are free. 

3. All of that in top of the hundreds of thousands of europeans who were enslaved by arabian muslims and no one ever mentions it. 4. At the risk of sounding white, old, conservative, christian and straight, you can find a lot of interesting stuff once you go below the usual marxist, revisionist historian.

5. PS. and that stuff of "oh, but poor black people, they were enslaved in the past!" is fallacious and downright BS man. Or are we know going to blame the current japanese and german armies for what happened in the second war? Truman descendants for the orders on little boy and fat man? Soon enough someone in Iran will blame the mongols and demand compensation for the millions dead in persia back on the days of Gengis Khan... like I mentioned in other thread, RL shouldn't be a fucking museum to live drenched on past deals and deeds.

P.P.S - ot - the whole straight parade is just BS as it is the gay parades. Lots of them are only a bunch of hypocrites that travel to come out of the closet in the middle of everyone else and have no real courage to do anything on daily lives. Besides, stop locking the goddamned roads to do stuff. It's silly and annoying.

1. White people are the ones who chose to have slaves. No one forced them. They created a demand, which was met.

2. What does SA stand for?

3. What's the relevance of this? Does it in any way make whites look better? Gypsies were enslaved in Romania, and that is almost never mentioned. Heck, I didn't even hear of that 'till college. History classes over here simply do not mention that Gypsies were enslaved by Romanians for centuries.

Whites created a whole discourse, allegedly supported by science, that said that blacks were subhuman, and thus it was justified for them to be used as slaves. Being slaves was considered 'beneficial' to them. I don't think many slave owning populations stooped so low.

4. The only worthless and manipulative revisioned histories I've ever seen all come from the right. My country is an example. I'll provide another one shortly.

5. Did you know that the Japanese do not really recongize their attrocities durign WWII? Do you know that they actually have an altar in China dedicated to honoring the monsters who commited attrocities over there as martyrs? Do you know that in the past decade Japanese schools books have been revisioned, as a result of actions from righ wingers, and have seriously watered down the attrocities they commited, because the truth allegedly hurts 'national pride'? The countries that started WWII still haven't fully recognized their fault.