mrstickball said:
I think the likelihood of a 3rd party is greater than you believe. Look up Ross Perot in the 1992 election. Had he not dropped out, he would have likely beaten both Bush and Clinton, as he was leading in the polls against both. Eventually, someone with money and a lot of guts will run 3rd party and win. Ross Perot was almost there, but didn't quite make it due to death threats against family, but someone will pick up that mantle. I think America wants a 3rd party, but there is just too much money in the R's and D's pockets that squashes the message out. Heck, in Ohio, I know enough Republican committee people that would gladly vote and turn Libertarian if they were viable. Its just a matter of time before someone with a good brand name steps out and turns the country upside down. |
If it does happen the timing has to be right. Even if a Libertarian somehow managed to get elected in 2012 or 2016 America, by all economic markers, does not have a healthy economy, and the supposed recovery is probably already over. It is likely that, with the way things are going at least, things could get worse in the future leading to a real depression.
Even though a 3rd party (most likely libertarians since they seem to have the most support) would have had nothing to do with said depression a libertarian president would be blamed for such a financial disaster which would set back the entire movement for who knows how long.
Maybe one day it will happen, but a lot will be riding on that term since Republicans and Democrats can survive having terrible figureheads as they have always had in the past ... but a much smaller party needs to have as spotless and incident free a term as possible.








