Its seems a case of cutting staff in the places that didn't land in the black and may have cost them even larger profits, so even though they made a lot of profit it may well have been generated away from where the cuts took place, also we don't know their expectations, maybe they targeted say 16% and only achieved 10% or some such thing, because to you and me its good sustainable profits, but to many execs it's I get bonuses from growing profit and in some cases they don't care how it's made just as long as it happens.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot







