Would electing the U.S Constitution to congress fix the budget mess?

[Kasz216]

richardhutnik said:

Viper1 said:
I suppose if an inanimate object were capable of self awareness and mobility, the Constitution would do very well in the position.

But if he's the only member voting Yea or Nay on a bill and the remaining members all vote contrary, there's not much he could do.

Well, since it is human beings who are elected, if they aren't able to balance the budget now, I am curious how also adding the demands of the Constitution on top of it are going to balance the budget.  Won't, even with the Constitutional Amendment still find ways to do an end around, rather than do cuts?

I was wondering if it also would be possible to put "Unnamed candidate" on the ballot somewhere, and have them run.  Since I see in polling that an unnamed candidate will often beat a known candidate.

Yes and no, they'd find ways around it, but it'd already be the ways they use now... using way too rosy growth and tax collection outlooks.

They won't be able to stretch them much further then they already do so cuts would pretty much have to happen.

Or a majority Congress voting for deficits outright, which is much more damning then individual voting "sure that adds to the deficit, but i voted against his this and this which passed."