Michael-5 said:
Warhawk isn't comparable to Halo 3. Warhawk is comparable to maybe CE Anniversary or Left 4 Dead. If Halo 3 lost to Warhawk....that would show something. Also no, 360's prized shooters did not beat Sony's. Killzone 3 beat Halo Reach and Left 4 Dead 2 by large margins, Uncharted 2 beat everything. Microsoft was only able to make a clear victory against Resistance. I'm not sure about you, but judging the the dismal amount of pre-orders for Resistance, the small amount of hype about the games on the forum, and the ommition of the game as a nominee as the best franchise for Sony elimination game. I don't think Resistance is one of PS3 fans most prized shooters. It's good, very good, but I bet you most PS3 fans appreciate Killzone and Uncharted more. I feel Resistance is to PS3 fans what Left 4 Dead is to 360 fans. It's third best. Microsoft never had a real chance against PS3 fans prized gems (Uncharted, GT, Killzone, God of War, and Heavy Rain). |
fair enough.
but i never said Warhawk was comparable to halo (i didnt vote that round because i havent played warhawk, and i i dont like halo). but halo deserved to win, which it did. i was just saying you were downplaying warhawk, which was a full retail game, later released on psn, like inFamous. and its hardly a remake, i barely resembles the psone game. its kind of like the new Twisted metal game coming out, more of a reboot.
also i was talking about halo beating Killzone 2.
Killzone 3 seems to be extremely popular for ps3 fans, my self included, its my favorite shooter of this gen.
and your right the resistance franchise is the tep child, though an awesome one, gets great reviews, and people like my self may be waitng for the 3dtv bundle to preorder.
my point was that the results of each round, have been pretty non biased, and predictable.