Seece said:
Cactus said:
brendude13 said:
Cactus said:
Seece said:
Wagram said: Though I hardly ever agree with his reviews. I love how you all flame on him for having an: OPINION. |
There comes a point where opinion is wrong, this is the difference between a bad and a good reviewer, being able to put aside your personal likes and dislikes and judging a game on what it is.
|
How can a a person's subjective experience with a videogame be factually incorrect? I think inFamous is a piece of shit, for example, and I'm sure that relegates me to the minority, but it doesn't make me wrong in any way.
I don't think that's possible. "What it is" implies that there is a correct answer, but no matter how unbiased a person thinks they are being while reviewing a game, the entire review is still based on their own personal and subjective experience.
|
Seece it right, opinions can only go so far, we can't always just sit back and accept opinions for what they are.
|
Because you personally disagree with them?
What if I said that I refuse to accept the opinion that inFamous is a good game?
|
Again, that isn't what a review is meant to be, some people get it, some people don't, you're the latter.
|
Alright. Read over my initial response to your post and explain to me how I'm wrong. I want to understand your line of thinking, but I'm finding it a bit difficult.