By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik said:
HappySqurriel said:
Rath said:
What you really need is to strip one of the existing houses of most of it's powers - in most other countries it's the upper house (the Senate in your case) that's much weaker. That way you can't end up with such a deadlock between the two.

Deadlock is a feature not a bug ...

The government of the United States was designed with several checks and balances that tend  to result in deadlock when a party tries to do something without support.  It is only a really big problem now because politicians are so worried about how their statements or actions will be portrayed in a 24 hour news cycle.

When you have a major fractioning when nothing can be supported to a sufficient degree, then end result is that the check and balance system stops working.  What will happen when the money runs out is exactly what the Tea Party folk want... except of course when there is no one guarding the borders any longer, or other things they would like are stopped.  Sometimes a feature can kill you, if out of balance.

Stop believing the BS protrayed by the media that a default will leave us incapable of paying bills or funding current projects.

Everything already appropriated for is going to be paid because it's already in the budget.  All this debt ceiling talk is about rasiing the debt limit to pay for project they PLAN to add.  It does absolutely nothing to projects already in operation.

I'm sick of how the media and most of the government (including Obama) portrays the debt ceiling limit issue and the possible default.  Damn fear mongering.



The rEVOLution is not being televised