Barozi said:
Black_Scurge said:
Barozi said:
Black_Scurge said:
Barozi said:
Black_Scurge said:
Barozi said:
Black_Scurge said:
None that are very good and most are pretty old |
At least 6 of the ones I listed could be considered as very good.
and why is it bad that they're old ? lol
It's actually better, since they should be pretty cheap by now.
|
as in could be in an alternate reality, because they aren't good or considered so
|
Sales, critics and gamers disagree with you
|
Risen
Divinity 2
Lost Odyssey
Blue Dragon
MagnaCarta 2
The Last Remnant
Tales of Vesperia
Infinite Undiscovery
all sold and scored fairly poorly, fable is advertised to hell and MS bribes the reviewers, mass effect is the only good game listed, well lost odyssey is okay but it's really dated
|
And I'll say it again. None of the games I listed are bad. Lost Oddyssey, Tales of Vesperia and Blue Dragon have great review scores. Most of the others are still good. (Good does NOT start with a 8.0, much earlier).
Don't make such accusations about Microsoft without proof or you won't last long.
|
Good starts with 8 for big name, hyped and MS games, since reviewers are always "nice" and "generous" with their scores and tales of ves isn't even exclusive and way to cut down your 6 good games to 4, things are going in the right direction
|
Good is not the same as great. Read my post again.
I didn't cut cut down anything. I said that 3 of them are great games (plus Mass Effect and both Fables). The rest is still good obviously.
I listed Tales of Vesperia, because it's exclusive in the Western world, which on this site and especially in the OP's case matters most.
|
Counting a series more then once, that's pretty low, especially since fable 3 is abysmal, and again yes GOOD starts at 8 for big name, hyped and MS games, since reviewers are always "nice" and "generous" with their scores for whatever reason (reason is obvious)
