BenVTrigger said:
Black_Scurge said:
Libara said:
Black_Scurge said:
Barozi said:
Black_Scurge said:
Barozi said:
Black_Scurge said:
None that are very good and most are pretty old |
At least 6 of the ones I listed could be considered as very good.
and why is it bad that they're old ? lol
It's actually better, since they should be pretty cheap by now.
|
as in could be in an alternate reality, because they aren't good or considered so
|
Sales, critics and gamers disagree with you
|
Risen
Divinity 2
Lost Odyssey
Blue Dragon
MagnaCarta 2
The Last Remnant
Tales of Vesperia
Infinite Undiscovery
all sold and scored fairly poorly, fable is advertised to hell and MS bribes the reviewers, mass effect is the only good game listed, well lost odyssey is okay but it's really dated
|
lol your credibility just died with that.
Lost Odyssey sits on metacritic at 78 with majority of reviews 80 or above, didn't know that was considered poor.
|
lol you trust metacritic, besides any MS exclusive gets bribed scores and like I said it's dated good 5 years ago doesn't mean good now
|
You can't be serious. So if a game is more than 5 years old it must be "dated" and "bad" huh. Well then I guess that means games like
Final Fantasy 1 - 12
Metal Gear Solid 1, 2, and 3
Ico and Shadow of the Colossus
All the Jak and Daxter games
All the old Ratchet games
Halo 1 and 2
All the old Zelda games
All the old Mario games
and thousands of other quality titles must suck now then right? I see what you're doing and that's trying to flame the 360's lineup and that's fine you have a right to I guess but at least try and use quality posts or facts to back up your claims. Saying stuff like MS bribes all reviewers (which there is litteraly ZERO evidence of) and all older games aren't good now is just rediculous.
|
I didn't say that... some games stand the test of time, others you look back at and think why the hell did I think this was fun, lost odysessy is one of the latter
