| padib said: My question is why would you consider it a good business opportunity to make a game for the Wii when it requires high definition and framerates as a core part of its success? I'm talking about a game like COD. That's a game I've played and I'm telling you it's a war simulation and needs to be high-def. I don't see how they could be dumb enough to want to push that on the Wii. However a game like Assassin's Creed as much as what you told me seems right the more I look at games like Tri the harder a time I have believing you. In AC graphics are purely aesthetic. They do bring in immersion, but the Wii could very well do that too from what I see. And no, DR doesn't compare to AC, they're very different. In DR there are zombies everywhere. It's not so dense in AC from what I remember. |
COD is way more popular than AC, a lot more. Which is why its probably on the Wii anyway. Its not cause its High Def, its cause its accesible and easy to get into. Cant really say the same about AC. But if you think it shouldnt be on Wii, then thats your opinion. I think all games should be muliplat, if possible. I have AC and play it regularly, if i honestly thought that game could be done on Wii, without heavy compromising, then i wouldnt even have this discussion and i own Wii also. IMHO Tri doesnt look that good.
It gets pretty dense in some of the towns in AC, especially multiplayer. We're talking at least 100 NPCs walking around on a map. Im not saying dont make an AC for Wii, hell they did it for PSP, im just saying you will not be getting the full experience. But i guess it's better than nothin??
