Wii owners continue to fund Ubisoft's HD games

[o_O.Q]

RolStoppable said:

o_O.Q said:

1. i thought people on this site rejected reviews? but regardless i hardly doubt any high profile developer like namco does a game expecting it to bomb in terms of critical reviews... from where i stand they attempted something new and in the end it didn't work out for them but i don't knock them for trying because thats what leads to innovation... its like how people claim the golden eye remake is better now with wii controls... if the devs hadn't attempted it this obviously wouldn't have happened 

2. never said that but as i said "the wii was to open up new forms of gameplay" right or wrong? if thats right why come down on them so hard when they attempt it?

3. "A true gamer rejects the bastardization of a beloved series"

what makes mario galaxy any less of a bastardisation? because it was successful? because you say so? 

 "A true gamer doesn't have the attitude of "sucks to be you, but it's your fault if you don't own the console where developers choose to put their real games on"

What you are arguing is that the Wii is a big piece of shit and deserved everything it had coming."

go back and quote me where i said any of that shit

1) and 2) Never before have I seen someone go to such great lengths to defend Soul Calibur Legends. But by doing so, you showed your true colors.

3) Those weren't words you directly said, I was describing your attitude and you've done more than enough in this thread to prove that my description is accurate. If you want people to believe otherwise, then you better have someone backing your views up. I don't think you'll find somebody to do that, because nobody would put his reputation on the line for someone like you.

1. 2. never before have i seen someone be so critical of devs for trying something new is an era where gamers are crying out for originality what you've basically been saying is you'd rather devs keep gaming secluded to what we know now instead of pushing forward with new ideas and innovating...

with this process there will be occasions where devs fail soul calibur is an example of this but that doesn't mean it shouldn't have been attempted 

3. well i just put this down to you being paronoid 

"then you better have someone backing your views up"

proof of what i've been claiming is readily available... go to google type in "originality" and "gaming" and read the links that come up... as i said this is something that is becoming a hot topic in the industry that devs aren't doing new things instead relying on the same formula thats assured sales ( a good example is people complaining about CoD )... and thats why i commend devs attempting new things like what was done with legends