archbrix said:
... and Wii U could be as little as $299; the same price as the non-hard drive 360 at launch. We don't even know how much PS3/Vita will be at the time of Wii U's launch. While Nintendo's track record isn't perfect, the Gamecube wasn't a new concept, just a new console. By new concepts, I mean introducing a new variant that delivers new experiences or interactions. Things like an analogue stick, touch-screen, mic, motion controls. Nintendo almost always shows ingenious ways to use these new devices. Sony strikes me more (in this case) as being fortunate to have a similar set-up, rather than years of toying with ideas, games and uses for it. And your Eyetoy reference doesn't help your case: Eyetoy launched in what, 2003? And Kinect has already matched its sales in less than a year? Not a strong argument for Sony's ability to make their concepts irresistible... And finally, no, they don't have games today that do everything that Wii U is talking about. Some things, sure, but while things like Ruin look cool, it's certainly not the same as streaming a full, ground-up PS3 game (like Uncharted 3 or Last Guardian) flawlessly to a hand-held screen where the two can interact with each other. Ps3/Vita would certainly have some advantages over Wii U as well, not the least of which is having an actual portable console to take with you, but It's the streaming method that Wii U is touting where I think Nintendo will be the victor. |
um they have :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYKutQ_QBBw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mASdFCTNA7I
anything they do with vita - ps3 would just be them building on the foundation made by years of experimenting with connectivity between ps3 and psp







