| Kasz216 said: Actually you'd be surprised. Evolutionary Biology and Psychology largely back up conservative agendas. Though ironically the teachers are just about top of the class when it comes to being liberals. They tend to fall into the "Humans are horrible beings therefore we need heavy laws to control their actions" camp. Ignoring the fact that polticians are in fact... human beings. Meaning all you are doing is ensuring one group of horrible beings is in control over everyone, rather then having multiple competing horrible beings fighting vs each other, creating the most freedom and protection for all. Outside which, you've really done nothing to argue your point. Rather then make excuses for why the point is true... which is largely irrelevent. |
What's to argue regarding my point? My point was this:
I have a problem with that article. It was only a quantitative research on what the political belief and affiliations of university proffesors are. It was not a qualitative research that studied how these proffesors structure their classes, and whether their political beliefs influence what they teach.
There's really not much more to say.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
