o_O.Q said:
cyberninja45 said:
o_O.Q said:
cyberninja45 said:
o_O.Q said:
cyberninja45 said:
o_O.Q said:
cyberninja45 said:
o_O.Q said:
cyberninja45 said:
o_O.Q said:
cyberninja45 said:
o_O.Q said:
cyberninja45 said:
Mr Khan said:
cyberninja45 said:
Can the PS3 transmitted HD video wirelessly?
|
Given that remote play works over the internet, i imagine it would certainly be capable of achieving that locally.
|
I doubt it. I seen the video on youtube but I cant tell if its wireless. In fact, heck no PS3 doesnt have this feature. What the hell is thread about?
|
you being unaware of the feature does not mean "PS3 doesnt have this feature"
( video of game streaming from ps3 - psp ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mASdFCTNA7I
...all it means is that you were unaaware of it
|
That video is conveniently dark, cant tell if its wireless or even if its a regular ps3 transmitting it.
|
um dude remote play is a known feature of ps3 it entails wireless transmission of content wireless between p-s3 and psp more details :
http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/12/30/ps3-how-to-setting-up-remote-play-between-your-psp-and-ps3/
http://uk.playstation.com/psp/support/network/detail/linked240472/item66124/Remote-Play/
why is it so hard to believe that it supported this? what else do you guys think is needed for this other than a wireless connection and enough processing power
|
No PS3 802.11g cannot transmit HD video wirelessly. U think there is a way to connect your ps3 to your hdTv wirelessy ( with some wireless adapter for the tv)? Even at 720P? NO.
So since the PS3 is using the 802.11g to transmit lower quality video this means it cannot connect to the internet or use the internet for anything else.
So in a nutshell if u are using this feature:
- The picture quality will be degraded.
- U cannot play your games online
IN one sentence
The ps3 cannot stream HD content to vita wirelessly, stream normally to hdtv, and be connected to the internet all at the same time. Not to the slightest
Which means PS3+ vita cannot do What the WiiU can do. This thread is irrelevant
|
"The ps3 cannot stream HD content to vita wirelessly"
quick question does the wii u controller output HD? go research that then you'll realise how what you just posted makes no sense
"So in a nutshell"
- The picture quality will be degraded. ( the same as with the wii u )
- U cannot play your games online ( this point lost me how? )
"So since the PS3 is using the 802.11g to transmit lower quality video ( LIKE THE WII U ALTHOUGH I DON'T THINK ITS USING 802.11 ) this means it cannot connect to the internet or use the internet for anything else. i asked this above but how? the ps3 has 2 methods of online connectivity wifi and wired
|
quick question does the wii u controller output HD
The picture quality will be degraded. ( the same as with the wii u )
There is no official specs. And no, counting pixel from videos don't count lol. But there is no noticeable degradation or any change of quality at all in the demos shown at E3. On a 6" screen WIth the HDTV in front of them to compare. And the Wii U can support more than 1 controller ( at least twice the resolution).
i asked this above but how? the ps3 has 2 methods of online connectivity wifi and wired
Remote play uses the internet functions of the PS3 in order to work. So no matter if its wireless or not you are using the ps3 bandwidth. Else you can use ps3 wireless and wired connections together and get twice the internet speed. U not gonna find some work around by using a wired connection for internet LOL.
|

im beginning to get the idea that this is pointless "But there is no noticeable degradation or any change of quality at all in the demos shown at E3"
the resolution of the tablet screen confirmed by nintendo ( up till now but may be revised later on ) : 854 x 480 (WVGA)
high def resolution ( bare minimum ) : 1280×720 ( 720p )
whats going on up there? / please explain that to me and it correlates with what you keep posted
"So no matter if its wireless or not you are using the ps3 bandwidth"
its possible to still access psn while playing lair according to what you've posted that shouldn't be possible please explain
look man all i ask if you try to debate me is at least to try to make an effort to educate yourself on whats going...
|
NIntendo did confirm the WiiU is capitable with more than one controls( your 480 x2= 960). But sorry cant find anything on Ninty confirming the resolution so some links can be helpful.
its possible to still access psn while playing lair according to what you've posted that shouldn't be possible please explain
Of course, you have to sign in to psn to start remote play dont you? But u cannot use the internet for anything else( or anything else meaningful is what i should of said) because you are using the PS3's single bandwidth!!!(Like downloading and playing online). Jeez
|
no... remote play works either via local direct connection or over the internet again you demonstrate beven further that you have no knowledge of how it works so why bother commenting on it?
"But sorry cant find anything on Ninty confirming the resolution so some links can be helpful."
http://thelatestgaming.com/wii-u-controller-isnt-hd/
quote from the article :
"Nintendo has confirmed to the media at E3 that the Wii U controller screen is not HD"
"NIntendo did confirm the WiiU is capitable with more than one controls"

no.... nintendo never confirmed that the wii u has support for more than one controller ( if i'm wrong prove it with a link ) and whats more is that all of the demos they've done so far imply that they didn't really consider supporting multiple controllers... go watch the demos again if you doubt me how many of them show more than one being used?... bare in mind i'm not saying they won't do it later on but that so far they haven't shown or said they will support it
|
http://wiiublog.com/multiple-controllers-on-the-wii-u-is-possible-but-cost-is-an-issue/
Iwata himself.
|
right... but the point is that it has not been confirmed that it will use multiple controllers as you said earlier all thats been said so far is that it is possible but that the price is prohibitive and so they didn't have plans of releasing the controller seperately...
|
http://www.news.com.au/technology/gaming/nintendos-shigeru-miyamoto-explains-the-new-wii-u/story-e6frfrt9-1226071923070
They are researching ways of play if your friend brings a controller. but the basic premise for Nintendo right now is one controller per home. Because of cost. But since its very possible third parties can use it if they wish.
To sum it all up
There are no offical specs but if it is true that the WiiU screen is not HD(not 720p). THen its close, the very link u post above clarify this as its impossible to tell(even under close examination as reported from virtually everyone. But maybe under a magnifying glas or somethin) the difference with a 1080p screen right infront of them( with a 6" ( not4.3") screen right infront there face to make examinations).
Which means that the 802.11g connection will not be even be close to being stream the video close to the quality of a single WiiU. (The ps3 currently streams at 272p )
Secondly you still cannot play your games online( since the 802.11g antennae is using the single 'modem's' bandwidth). If this was possible Nintendo would have been using the 3ds WiiU/Wii configuration( simular to the Ps3/psp configuration). OR the WiiU controller would have been backwards compatible with the Wii.
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/310648/news/wii-u-and-3ds-connection-has-limitations-iwata-admits/
since the 3ds use 802.11g connection. it forces the single wiiU modem to stop streaming to internet(wirelessly or wired) and the modem's/transmitter's bandwidth would use its 802.11g antennae to transmit to the 3ds. Also if 802.11g was capable of streaming video quality as WiiU does, then they would have been using it( with a seperate transmitter) and the 3ds would have been able to work no problems.
And finally even if all the above was possible the PS3 doesnt have the processing power transmit the multiple views at the same game without loss in graphical quality.
Again
The ps3 cannot stream high resolution content to vita wirelessly, stream normally to hdtv, and be connected to the internet (in any meaningful way) all at the same time. Not to the slightest
Which means PS3+ vita cannot do What the WiiU can do. This thread is irrelevant
|
"since its very possible third parties can use it if they wish."
wrong they can't program for a feature that isn't confirmed yet that should be obvious...
"(The ps3 currently streams at 272p )"
wrong again the ps3 can be set up as a media server to stream to pcs at resolutions higher than even the resolution of the wii u screen
"Secondly you still cannot play your games online( since the 802.11g antennae is using the single 'modem's' bandwidth)"
personally i don't know here maybe, maybe not seeing your posts so far im pretty sure i can't really take your claims seriously as i've had to prove most of them wrong
secondly the psp can connect with up to 16 other psps via wifi for gaming as with other devices but somehow you're trying to convince me that the ps3 can't handle two similar connections which i find to be nonsensical but you may be right
"And finally even if all the above was possible the PS3 doesnt have the processing power transmit the multiple views at the same game without loss in graphical quality."
the same applies to the wii u even though you haven't figured that out yet as i confirmed the wii u controller is not even close to hd
"The ps3 cannot stream high resolution content to vita wirelessly"

streaming to the vita means streaming at a higher resolution than wii u...
"stream normally to hdtv"
lol at this point i'm trying to figure out if you're trying to be funny...
"PS3+ vita cannot do What the WiiU can do"
and up till now you still haven't been able to demontrate this properly most of the claims you've made are just downright wrong
btw what type of wireless connection is nintendo using for the wii u to its controller you keep claiming that 802.11 isn't enough to support this type of connection ( even though its the most widely used connectivity standard for close to mid range ) please elaborate on that
|