Kyuubi Ricky SSJ2 said:
ThePS3News said:
IamAwsome said:
-Sony said that the Vita wouldn't have any internal memory.
-The 3DS should win in portability because it's smaller, (and Sony also said that the Vita isn't pocketable)
-Why are you assuming that the Vita's browser is better? Did Sony say that it would support Flash?
-Both have outdated cameras (640x480= 0.3 MP)
-Also, durability should be a tie (we aren't sure about the Vita)
|
When did Sony ever say that Vita would not have internal memory??? I got mutliple links that say otherwise...
PSP browser was better than DS browser and rumors are that PS-VITA and PS3 will support google chrome which is why i gave browser to PS-VITA
3DS is not really a pocket carrying device either seeing that it is about he same size as the Vita
Vita camera is a 960 x 544 camera compared to the 3DS's 0.3 megapixel camera.
Durabilty i guess can be a tie though. :)
|
Yes it is. The 3DS easily fits into my pockets, it almost the same size as a DS Lite but just a tiny bit chunkier. Have you ever seen a PS Vita in real life? It's much bigger than the 3DS, it's even bigger than the PSP 1000.
Also 3DS wins in the durability department as well due to it's clam shell design.
3DS battery life is 3-5 hours on max settings not 3-4.
3DS file compatibility:
- Photo - JPEG, MPO
- Audio - MP3, ACC (.m4a, .mp4 or .3gp)
- Video - N/A
You're missing Infrared Transceiver from connectivity on the 3DS side.
Both systems have microphones.
Also nothings been officially confirmed on the PS Vita internal storage.
|
"Also 3DS wins in the durability department as well due to it's clam shell design"
i don't understand this how does having the screen supported by a thin plastic lid make it more durable than a candy bar form factor?
"Also nothings been officially confirmed on the PS Vita internal storage."
theres no internal memory it has to be bought seperately
