By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
padib said:
Rath said:

So, the explanation is given in the article I provided: 
http://www.nwcreation.net/fossilsorting.html

That article makes no sense. You find sea dwelling creatures such as the Plesiosaur amongst the dinosaurs and huge lowland dwelling creatures such as the Diprotodon amongst humans and other more recently existing creatures. Once again it's doing its best to make the evidence fit the theory, rather than looking at the evidence and building up a theory around it.

These are the counter-points I'm looking for, and I like them. Keep them coming. At least you address what is said, not who said it. K, so the question is, for those kinds of cases, which layers are these found in? Do you have a source I can work with?

Do be fair though. It's not because you found an exception case here and there that you discredit the whole article. The guy makes a point, I'd like to see if it holds water.


The entire article is bollocks though - the fossil sorting mechanism he suggests does not match the layering of fossils that are found. Many sea creatures are found on the lowest layers while many creatures who you woul expect to be screwed in the case of a world-wide flood - such as the mammoth - are found amongst humans.