| padib said: Do be fair though. It's not because you found an exception case here and there that you discredit the whole article. The guy makes a point, I'd like to see if it holds water. |
No, the guy that wrote the article is a complete nutjob, like all the other creatonists and ID morons. Links to Youtube videos have been given in this thread that thoroughly explain the science behind science and the nuttiness of the creatonists/ID nuts.
I do not discuss these subjects anymore - for the same reason I do not discuss with flat earthers or hollow earth worshippers anymore: It is completely pointless to try and explain scientific reasoning to this group of people. They have their religious dogmas deeply imprinted on them and they will shut down immediately when confronted with science. You can see this behaviour in many of the posters of this thread: Failure of the educational process paired with religius dogma (and probably paired with watching FoxNews all day).
As much as I admire the people here that try to explain some scientific reasoning into that crowd by writing walls of texts: It is completely and utterly futile - these people will not change one bit. The scary thing is: quite often these people turn out to be tomorrow's Tea party members...
