dahuman said:
Seece said:
snowdog said:
What's wrong with having both..? I'm not a big fan of most of Nintendo's IPs but the thought of Zelda and Metroid Prime in 1080p has me salivating like a loon.
I'm just hoping that these FPS games are going to give you the opportunity to use remote and nunchuck pointer controls as an option. Being forced to use inferior dual analogs isn't going to be good. |
Motion hasn't proved FPS is best this gen, it won't next gen either ..
|
Don't you mean like, "motion hasn't been proved to be the best FPS control this gen?" =P Though we all know the problem was Wii being underpowered so devs didn't bring the big guns to it though, because it's better than dual analog if you are good enough with it and the game is designed around it, it's closer to mouse/kbo combo speed/accuracy than dual analog for sure. We are not talking about Kinect of course, because that's a hell no for FPS.
|
I have to agree fully. I played WaW and BO a lot on the Wii. I haven't gotten around to finishing Goldeneye but I played it decently. Even though Goldeneye had more customization I prefered the way WaW and BO controlled with the Wiimote + nunchuck. I can aim with ease, move around with ease, etc.. with Wiimote + nunchuck. Granted it takes some time to first grasp it but once you have it down you probably never want to go back to dual analog. The only problem is that it hurts my wrist a little after about 2 or so hours. However, one should be taking a break at that time anyways. I never want to go back to dual analog for FPS ever again.
