| snakenobi said: 1. Bleem won the case cause its defense was based against people owning PS1 console hardware and its games not people who just owned the game.go check what happened then come back. 2. the free emulation thing was based on the PSX emulator making profit on android market,it didn't have anything to do with the dolphin one. 3.the fact is that its not big enough,the day it gets being used in masses,it will be banned 4. that way you could say the current PS3 priacy thing wasn't illegal either as its defense was based on the following 4.5 u owned the game and PS3 and were then copying it to the HDD and playing it.that is fine,but that is not what happens. 5. if you still stand with your comment then u are as good as saying that piracy doesn't exist |
1.I hate using Wikipedia but
|
wikipedia says:
|
Sony sued them because they were selling emus... and Sony LOST
2. By law you can't sell open source software for a profit. That's basically the only rule to open source software. The emus that he was selling on the android marketplace were based on open source software. Therefor illegal. Note: illegal because he sold open source software, not because emus are illegal
3. No, just no.
4. Wah?
4.5. Illegal, you can't rip games. That constitutes breaking DRM, which is a violation of the DMCA
5. No, in fact I've said the opposite of this several times. Playing ROMs is ILLEGAL and is PIRACY!







