Final-Fan said: 1. It's a fact that they're more intelligent than you think. |
1. No, not when it's stille debatable whether or not what they have can even be described as "intelligence".
2. What?
3. I'm comparing different levels of the food chain with eachother. We've already been through this. Stop going in circles.
4. Domesticated animals do not belong in nature. If they can't survive in nature, they don't deserve to survive at all (survival of the fittest).
Plants are the chief suppliers of oxygen for the world. No plants >>> all earth-bound life dies. Humans would die to, if not for starvation (they'd deplete marine life soon enough), then from the lack of oxygen. Also, here's a little something that kinda puts a fork in your argument:
http://www.practical-water-gardens.com/uvch0104.htm
Also, you are aware that water is made up of oxygen, no? (H2O and all that, the oxygen from it isn't produced by algea).
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)