Why do we exist,GOD or BIG BANG theory?

[Sri Lumpa]

snakenobi said:

Sri Lumpa said:

snakenobi said:
i read it somewhere.

google it you will find it.

different scientists have different ways of proving it.

You are the one claiming it exists, the burden of proof is on you. You don't have to prove the theory, just that it exists.

If Hydrogen and Nitrogen collide you get ammonia. Sure, you could then use that ammonia as a feedstock to create a bomb but it is not the kind of bang the big bang theory talks about.

The problem about that theory and especially with claiming it to be a big bang theory is that the big bang theory is about the early stages of the universe whereas that theory talks about what would have been before this universe. Even if we were to find out that the universe would eventually stop expanding and start contracting in a reverse big bang (a big crunch) which would eventually explode again it still would have nothing to do with hydrogen and nitrogen atoms but would be due to the gravitational force.

burden,you make this sound like a war?

i gave it as of the reasons,never said its the correct one.

alrite,i would agree.never said you were wrong.

Not like war, like a debate.

If I was claiming that the sky was blue I would be unlikely to be challenged in that assertion; but if I was claiming that it was striped green and blood red with yellow polka dots I would be asked to support that assertion.

If I asserted the blueness of the sky and was challenged in that assertion I would first go into more details by qualifying my assertion as it is not always blue (it can be white or grey with clouds, orange and red at sunset...) and I would link to articles explaining the diffraction of sunlight in the upper atmosphere causing it to appear blue most of the time and red near sunrise/sunset.

If I asserted its green/red stripeness and yellow polka dotness and did not manage to support that assertion I would expect to be ridiculed for it.

Your assertion that the big bang was caused by Hydrogen and Nitrogen atoms colliding is of the polka dot variety, which is why it was met by such incredulity not only by me but also by others who have a reasonable amount of understanding of the big bang.

It is not so much a question of right or wrong, more a question of an outlandish claim that I would very much like to see a source for as if there is such a theory (and I mean a serious theory advanced by a serious scientist) then I would be interested in reading about it. However I suspect that you read something about the big bang and that not understanding much about it you misinterpreted to mean what you stated.

It wasn't even that central to your post, but it was just such a huge WTF moment when i read it that I had to read it a few more time to make sure I read it correctly.

Ok, time to go to bed for me. Good night everyone.