Kasz216 said:
No he entered the US in it. Which was even more pointless. At least Iraq and Afghanistan had douches in power that nobody was trying to get rid of. Libya... we could of did NOTHING and just let europe take care of it for once. Besides, It's not like there aren't other people getting slaughtered by enemies of the west while we do nothing. |
Not really. At least not in the context of an active civil war that is something that could be intervened in readily. I mean the Burmese have been playing cat-and-mouse with the Karin and the Kachin for decades, and the Laotians have an on-again-off-again thing against the Hmong, though neither of them are really our enemies (for balance of power purposes against the Vietnamese, we're even slightly friendly with Laos), but nobody else out there is just out-and-out waging full on war against a group of their people that is professing a desire for democracy (though i'm fully aware that the Libyan Rebels in this case probably don't want democracy, or at least don't want the kind of democracy we want)
I also agree that Europe should be pulling more of the weight in there, but i disagree in that the US should have a role either way
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.