mrstickball said:
As HS has said, splitting along political divides may be a good thing. If you do such a thing, then you allow various ideologies to be fully vetted. Hyper-liberal areas and hyper-conservative regions can finally make policies as they see fit, and allow for more rapid prototyping of different governmental models. Not every state needs to split, but I think there are a lot of states like CA, Washington, Oregon, Texas, New York, and a few others that could potentially benefit from it, as their demographics are not similar in distribution. |
instead of splitting perhaps people could just move wherever they think follows their ideology? This behavior is not uncommon and if you look hard enough, there are minority groups being ignored in every area in every state. chances are that there are pockets of liberals even in so-called "conservative CA" and they have no voice as well.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler







