Conegamer said:
Hey, that's good enough for me! So that's for, correct? When it closes tomorrow I'll list all the places, so just check back to see if you're up for the right thing if that makes sense! Of course, a (gotta get this right) master-debater should be able to argue for either side, right? |
I'm male and have passed the teenage years, you'd have a 98% chance of being right with both spellings.
On topic:
It's not a neccessity. After all, one can hold ability to argue a position with skilled execution yet lack the empathy to understand the other side.
However, I shall be looking and waiting eagerly for any information releases on this.
The true test of any scholar's work is not what his contemporaries say, but what happens to his work in the next 25 or 50 years. - Milton Friedman.