pezus said:
Xen said:
oniyide said:
DaColdFlash said:
vlad321 said:
DaColdFlash said:
Releasing a 4year old PC benchmark on consoles. Yes that's what we needed. |
Except that the consoles will still not be able to play the game with as good graphics, and eventhough the gameplay itself was very mediocre it is about on par with console games. Basically, what's your point?
OT:
I have always said Crysis was mediocre, PC exclusive or not, so I am curious how HD console gamers will react to it now.
|
Crysis is senseless on consoles. The game was all and pretty much only about graphics, trying to exhaust even the best hardware. The whole game was a whole benchmark and it was mostly used for dick comparison hardware wise. Now the game itself is as you stated pretty mediocre which makes the only good thing about it it's technology. Let's just cut straight to the point:
Consoles = Not so good graphics
Crysis = All about graphics
What's left? Gameplay
How's the gameplay? Mediocre
Where's the sense in releasing a 4year old mediocre shooter? Nowhere
That was pretty much my point.
|
good point, but are you saying its impossible to get the console version to look even close to the PC one?? and was the PC version only able to run on super PC setups?? im not being difficult, im asking because i honestly dont know
|
Back when it released it knocked PC's down left and right... these days, a $400 build will eat it up.
|
I'm not so sure about that. They will run it, sure, but not "eat it up"
|
Eat it up? Deffinitely not in 1080p. Hell even in 1680x1050 the game will have frame irruptions with no AA at all!
