By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake on 02 July 2011
Edit Thread
Akvod said:
sapphi_snake said:
Akvod said:

Errr. I think you guys have a weak argument actually. There are such thing as loli pornography. Are you guys saying that loli "art" is okay, but loli "porn" isn't?

Look, this artistic argument itself is stupid. The question should be, "What's the consequence of allowing loli pornography to be purchased or owned"?

My answer: Nothing, as of now. No individual is having their rights violated by the creation and ownership of such material, and no negative social effects have been scientifically found yet.

Actually, graphic images portraying children in sexual situations is simply illegal, regardless of whether it's featured in a genuine work of art or not.

Err... Your point?

Was replying to the underlined.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)