Isn't making the warriors be far from each other automatically give the Apache an advantage? Why can't I just say "let's make the hypothetical situation with both warriors being feet from each other." Then who wins? The show doesn't cover all the bases, even though it is admittedly entertaining. For instance, if Apaches are ranged specialists, do you think a Gladiator force would have went into battle against them without proper ranged units to help them?
The show can be messed up sometimes because it doesn't always really measure which warrior is "better". It's like, "today's show is Rifleman vs. Swordsman. SUSPENSE!" There's just a lot of hypotheticals and what if's, ya know?








