Runa216 said:
Silicone on the G-spot apparently engorges it and makes it easier to stimulate and achieve orgasm, or so I'm told. Never go the procedure myself :P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ And I'm not even gonna respond to that other dude who's arguing with me over ethics...he has some...issues with logic that would require entirely too much of my time to explain and debunk than is worth my time. No matter what, though, your body your choice. End of discussion. If it harms you, that's your choice. skydiving could harm you, getting into a car could harm you, it's up to you and you alone to weigh the pros and cons. Your "it's immoral to do it" stance is just another example of repression of self-expression. Derp indeed, sir. Derp indeed. |
You are the one who seems to have with logic issues (and reading and comprehension).
I have said that doing the surgery is immoral? Where? Quote it. That's exactly why I wrote about ethics first (1)(2), and on another item and paragraph (3) I wrote about my moral standards about guns/drugs/etc, and I only did that because you come up with that crazy topic about guns/etc. If you are a writter, you are supposed to know something called "Illustration by exemplification "
I said that just doing it just because the patient wants it, is an unethical position by the doctor IF it will be, or is highly likely to be more maleficent than beneficent. On my very first comment on this thread I said that people can do it to their own body. (theoretically, a lot harder on pratice)
You doing to yourself, is one thing, another person, a doctor (in the case of this thread) can't just do every single wish of a patient. Something you would know, IF you have read anything about medical ethics as I said. (It really isn't a large book).
"Illustration by exemplification ": suicide is not illegal, but assiting someone doing it, or instigate someone to do it, IS. (That's an analogy, in case you don't know)
You are confounding things. A person has its own free will and a doctor can respect every patient's free will, but it doesn't that exempts the doctor of his responsabilities and with the medical ethics code, nor obligates him to do it. That means that a patient can want anything, but it doesn't mean that just that is ok to the doctor put the patient in a situation like I explained. SINCE WHEN I tried to refute "your body you choice"? Nor just I have agreed with that in my two comments(Three counting this one), but I ALSO explained the difference the person/patient free will and the doctors/surgeon obligation/responsabilities.
You can try to ignore the things you don't know, but it will not make it change, just by that, or disappear. Since is the internet, I consired puting the pisture "make it all go away" to you, but that would be as childish as you are being (I really have limit to childish). And by not doing that, I'm expecting you to try use your logic of writter.
Read 3 times a text. First: locate the ideas, second: relate them, third: try to refute/contest them, or add something to them.
You'll need to do this with my first comments too, you took words from my comments in a incoherent/fragmentary way.
