Mr Khan on 01 July 2011
| Farmageddon said: "But all porn is devoid of artistic value. By definition pornography is the portrayal of explicit subject matter meant to cause sexual satisfaction and excitement. That's the sole intent pof porn. If it does more than that, then it is not really porn, but an artistic creation that features sex. " And how is the law to define objectively wether a work is porn or "an artistic creation that features sex"? Besides, you do sound awfully elitist in your "right" definition of art, but I'd rather not get into that as that's actually not relevant to the discussion. Do you still maintain that anyone who could like material such as lolicon is mentally ill? |
That's what the Miller Test is to determine (as it defines porn as any work that has no appeal outside of the prurient (gets-you-off) interests), and generally it's fairly obvious whether a work is something you're just meant to get off on, or has some sort of other meaning, though ultimately it's subjective like any judicial test, it's less subjective than most
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
