Farmageddon on 30 June 2011
"But all porn is devoid of artistic value. By definition pornography is the portrayal of explicit subject matter meant to cause sexual satisfaction and excitement. That's the sole intent pof porn. If it does more than that, then it is not really porn, but an artistic creation that features sex. "
And how is the law to define objectively wether a work is porn or "an artistic creation that features sex"?
Besides, you do sound awfully elitist in your "right" definition of art, but I'd rather not get into that as that's actually not relevant to the discussion. Do you still maintain that anyone who could like material such as lolicon is mentally ill?
