By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
scottie said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
scottie said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
scottie said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
scottie said:
Ugh, the business world sucks. They could have made much better games for the 3DS, but ya gotta go where you get paid to go I suppose.

 

 

and you should be able to easily see what they can do with more advanced hw too :) they have already shown better AR games than any found on 3ds, on the psv..


Yes, I am aware that the company makes good AR games (ignoring that fighting one apparently) that's why I said it is a shame they aren't free to work on the portable that suits them more.

 

And when you say any on the 3DS, I assume you're refing to the one that Nintendo gave out for free for no particular reason?


hmm not sure if you have seen the gameplay in action but reality Fighters is a very impressive AR game...and I disagree the one that will suit them would the one with more power and options, the PSV. heck the one with better cameras even lol

and I have no idea if they are free or not, but have seen countless vids on 3ds AR, nothing really impressive. If you have anything you think is very impressive pelase share, I sincerely would like to see it


No, I haven't seen or heard anything of reality fighters other than what is in this thread. hence why I included apparently, because the consensus in this thread is that it's negative. I don't really care either way, I am not a fan of MK/Tekken/Street Fighter, so I doubt I personally would like Reality Fighters.

 

Why are you asking me to point out good AR games on the 3DS? My point is that there are no good AR games, despite the fact that there should be. The only attempts at AR I am aware of on the 3DS are the face invaders thing and some pokemon thing they released/announced at E3. Both of which are free, not really full games. I am surprised to find that you would take a minor horsepower bumb as more important than 3D for AR games, ie games that are attempting to offer virtual reality, regardless of your preference, I would certainly find games along the lines of invisimals more fun if they were given 3D and a decent graphics jump instead of staying 2d and getting a big graphics jump. Consequently, I think it a shame that this company will not have an opportunity to make a 3D AR game until the PSP3.


>_> minor difference in horsepower? yeah how about no. I don't want to do a list war here but if you think there is no big difference you are just kidding yourself

and I'm not talking about the graphical power, which also helps in creating a good AR imho but I was refering to other things such as processing power and much better cameras on the system which will allow for more advanced use of AR in games. Reality Fighters already show a lot of promise in that regard. no need for card nonsense which was done in the psp era and can play the game anywhere as you please etc. I think it would have been a shame if they had to make games just for 3ds cuz some would prefer seeing things in 3d, so i look forward to seeing what they can do in the future with proper financing and powerful hardware....the results are there to see already

and for gods sake I hope sony doesn't use 3d in the psp after psv either..rather useless feature imo..I rather have a oled screen than that. it just comes down to personal preference



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!