azrm2k said:
I have seen the comparison videos before including that AC one and you're right that they didn't speak at all about loading or framerate issues, the framerate issues was just a theoretical example and the loading time was based off of an Orange Box comparison video I saw of Portal. The thing is though the 'washed out' look in that video is quite striking and easily noticable to anybody. The only evidence I have been shown that enabling Full RGB can help with component inputs is ssj12's testimony that with his own eyes he sees 'a minor improvement'. Therefore since they used component cables for both I have a hard time believing that the 360 version looking far better was due to the 360 enabling Full RGB with component cables and them not bothering to enable it for the PS3. If anybody can actually find evidence that component cables can utilize Full RGB for such a graphical advantage then I will gladly admit I was wrong but everything from Sony's PS3 manual to all forum threads I can find state otherwise. |
so you agree that my comments stand then? (bottom quote)
since GT talked nothing about framerate issues and loading times and the video was in no way accurately informative.
and customers dont need to pay the premium $10,250 to be able to use HDMI cables.
which would mean GT should not hold useless half assed comparison videos.....
| iclim4 said: "We create them so that people who own both systems can be a little more informed on which version to buy." yeah those are all lies then.. if they know that they cant capture the videos using HDMI then why release comparison vids at all? |

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iclim4 - "The Friends Thread changed my life!" (Pervert Alert!) Tags? 







